W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2007

[Bug 4432] Equivlance based on lexical equivlaence or value equivalence?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:30:56 +0000
CC:
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1HWySe-0005hy-57@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4432

           Summary: Equivlance based on lexical equivlaence or value
                    equivalence?
           Product: WSDL
           Version: 2.0
          Platform: All
               URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-
                    desc/2007Mar/0009
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Core
        AssignedTo: plh@w3.org
        ReportedBy: jonathan@wso2.com
         QAContact: www-ws-desc@w3.org


[[
2.15 Equivalence of Components

* For values of a simple type (see 2.14 XML Schema 1.0 Simple Types Used in the
Component Model), this means that they contain the exact same values. For
instance, two string values are equivalent if they contain the same sequence of
Unicode characters, as described in [Character Model for the WWW]
]]

Should we not be talking about value-space equivalence rather than strict
lexical-space equivalent? For instance, “1” and “true” would not be equivalent
according to this definition, whereas they would according to the XML Infoset.
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 17:31:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:46 GMT