W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2007

Proposal for Binding-0055 and Binding-1207001

From: Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:11:08 -0800
Message-ID: <22bb8a4e0702231511r4413d29ew3b38c02e05a71e93@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Gurus,

Binding-0055 states "A Binding component that defines bindings for an
Interface component MUST define bindings for all the operations and faults
of that Interface component."

Binding-1207001 states "A Binding component that defines bindings for an
Interface component MUST define bindings for all the faults of that
Interface component that are referenced from any of the operations in that
Interface component."

I think Binding-0055 is not completely valid, since the Binding only needs
to define bindings for faults in the interface component that are actually
referenced in one of the interface operations.

I suggest two alternatives.

Alternative 1 - Combine the two assertions into a new Assertion.

i.e. an assertion that states

 "A Binding component that defines bindings for an Interface component MUST
define bindings for all the operations of that Interface component and all
faults of that Interface component that are referenced from any of the
operations in that Interface component."


Alternative 2 - Alter Binding-0055 to remove the portion relating to faults.

i.e. have Binding-0055 state as follows.
"A Binding component that defines bindings for an Interface component MUST
define bindings for all the operations of that Interface component."
HTH,
Ram
-- 
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor
Received on Friday, 23 February 2007 23:11:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:46 GMT