RE: URI mailing list and whttp:location

I posted a summary of our design, and some of its issues at [1].  After
reading the whole thread, I am more comfortable that we've adopted a design
that addresses many of the gotchas in an appropriate way.  And I'm
comfortable stating that a fool-proof solution is impractical.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2007Feb/0023.html

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Youenn Fablet
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 6:31 AM
> To: www-ws-desc
> Subject: URI mailing list and whttp:location
> 
> 
> I just have a quick look at the following mail from the URI mailing
> list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2007Feb/0006.html
> It seems that our current work on whttp:location/escaping and their
> discussions are pretty close.
> Regards,
>     Youenn