Arthur, Today in the WG call we discussed whether we should renumber the assertions as we had planned to do. Some assertions use a 4-digit number and others use a 7-digit number which includes a locator code. Presumably they should all move toward the 7 digit code (though beyond indicating which part of the spec the assertion is found in the extra digits don't prove that useful - one can take the assertion number and use it as a fragment identifier against the spec to locate the corresponding text.) We however weren't able to solicit a volunteer to do this work, which is fairly substantial when one considers that any assertion number change needs to simultaneously be changed throughout the test suite metadata. I even reluctantly volunteered if the WG expressed a strong desire to normalize these identifiers. It didn't. John did offer to try to fit in some work along this line, but first perhaps it would be good to see how motivated you are to have consistent assertion identifiers. Are you motivated enough to do some significant editorial work? Jonathan Marsh - <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com - <http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.comReceived on Friday, 23 February 2007 00:50:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 23 February 2007 00:50:38 GMT