W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2007

RE: contentEncoding header with empty body

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:43:24 -0800
To: <keith@wso2.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <03a201c75455$d7f2b7b0$3501a8c0@DELLICIOUS>

I think this is GIGO with the test framework.  The simplest fix is to add
whttp:contentEncoding="" to the <input> binding operation, so we don't have
to look for these edge cases when generating the assertions.  The test case
will still test what we want it to, which is that the <output> message is

I'll check in such a fix shortly.

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Chapman [mailto:keith@wso2.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 9:11 PM
> To: Jonathan Marsh
> Subject: contentEncoding header with empty body
> Just missed another thing regarding MessageTest-3G.
> |CodedEchoHTTPBinding |Binding has contentEncodingDefault as gzip. This
> in effect makes the contentEncoding of the operation GuaranteedFault
> gzip. The issue is that there is no input to GuaranteedFault and hence
> its body is empty. There is nothing bto be gziped. Is the gzip header
> needed in this case too? The framework looks for it.
> Thanks,
> Keith.
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 18:43:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:03 UTC