W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2007

RE: CR120 (was: Status: Editorial action items)

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:58:35 -0800
To: "'Jean-Jacques Moreau'" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00d201c751f4$163f3660$3501a8c0@DELLICIOUS>

OK, that makes sense, but I still think there's a hole, namely how to
construct the "In" message when the content model is #any.  The intent of
CR120 was to allow #none, not to allow #any and #other to be bound to SOAP
Response...  Perhaps we simply make it explicit for SOAP Response that 'The
{message content model} MUST be either #element or #none.  The "In" message
is empty when the content model is #none.'

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 7:57 AM
> To: Jonathan Marsh
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: CR120 (was: Status: Editorial action items)
> Some more...
> Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> > ----------
> > Re CR120, can you point me to where the fix has been made?  I can't find
> it where I expected it - the second sentence of 6.8.2.
> >
> I've implemented the fix in, i.e. set the value of "In" only
> when the type is #element. (Hence, by implication, do nothing when #none.)
> My reading of 6.4.3, bullet 1.2:
> > If the value is "#none" then the payload MUST be empty and the value
> > of the corresponding serialization property ({http input
> > serialization} or {http output serialization}) is ignored.
> .. was that there was no other change to perform.
> Am I missing something?
> JJ.
Received on Friday, 16 February 2007 17:58:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:03 UTC