Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: >> Isn't the text you quote above already covered elsewhere (e.g. 5.10.4.xxx)? Can't we simply drop it? >> > > I don't believe so since we only provide mapping to SOAP > Request-Response in 5.10.4. IMO, 5.10.4 should cover SOAP Response as well, thus my question. > Don't we cover SOAP-Response in 5.10.4.2 ? >> But not to the exact same Req-Resp MEP! (although they share the same >> URI and, probably?, the same behaviour) See my earlier message [3]. >> > > ok. Btw, we will link to the latest SOAP 1.2 REC, ie the one that will > contain the revised SOAP Request-Response MEP. > Could this break our implementations? JJ.Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 14:30:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 15 February 2007 14:30:25 GMT