W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2007

Re: CR112, CR144, and everything

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:29:48 +0100
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Cc: www-ws-desc <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-id: <45D46E5C.3010204@crf.canon.fr>

Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
>> Isn't the text you quote above already covered elsewhere (e.g. 5.10.4.xxx)? Can't we simply drop it?
>>     
>
> I don't believe so since we only provide mapping to SOAP
> Request-Response in 5.10.4. IMO, 5.10.4 should cover SOAP Response as well, thus my question.
>   
Don't we cover SOAP-Response in 5.10.4.2 ?
>> But not to the exact same Req-Resp MEP! (although they share the same 
>> URI and, probably?, the same behaviour) See my earlier message [3].
>>     
>
> ok. Btw, we will link to the latest SOAP 1.2 REC, ie the one that will
> contain the revised SOAP Request-Response MEP.
>   
Could this break our implementations?

JJ.
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 14:30:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:46 GMT