W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2007

RE: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:01:36 -0800
To: "'Jacek Kopecky'" <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>, "'WS-Description WG'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001e01c74af2$d0a7fe00$3501a8c0@DELLICIOUS>

I agree these would be great to add to the test suite, esp. the plain.wsdl
to ensure you're annotating something our tools have reported success with.

The other test cases, which require support for an extension, would be
useful for testing of validators, but would not show up on the interchange
results unless implementations declared support for them.  Since the
extension is straightforward, I would be able to trivially support it in
wsdl-xslt, and would be willing to do that work at some point.

However, the sparql-query test case demonstrates that we don't have a good
model for sharing test cases.  If we copy the test cases into our test
suite, how should they be kept in sync?  Should we write a task that
refreshes them from your "master" copy?  Should we own the master and have
you maintain them in one place?

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Jacek Kopecky
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:11 AM
> To: WS-Description WG
> Subject: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite
> Hi all,
> there are 18 WSDL 2.0 documents at [1] annotated with SAWSDL attributes
> for the purposes of the SAWSDL's nascent test suite [2] that might be
> useful in the WSDL test suite as well.
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/wsdl2.0/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/testsuite
> It's basically one simple WSDL document annotated in various places with
> our extension attributes, but I've already had a problem with Woden
> parsing of 04-fault-annotation.wsdl due to what seems to be a bug in
> fault reference handling, so maybe the files could be helpful.
> Currently the links are member-only, but I'm working on fixing that. And
> I'll zip the files and send them to somebody if that would help. I don't
> feel comfortable updating the WSDL test suite directly myself, having
> never done it before.
> Hope it helps,
> Jacek
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:01:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:03 UTC