W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Schema file names for wsdl-extensions seem inconsistent

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:56:29 -0400
To: "John Kaputin (gmail)" <jakaputin@gmail.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1177595789.3794.9.camel@localhost>

On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 16:34 +0000, John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
> Having looked further, I see the "wsdl20" convention is used for the
> Dated Versions of the schemas for the latest wsdl, wsdl-instance and
> wsdl-extensions namespaces, so am I right in assuming that wsdl20.xsd,
> wsdl20-instance.xsd and wsdl20-extensions.xsd are correct and will
> eventually be the file names used for both the Latest and Dated
> versions of the schemas for those namespaces?

Here what we have have for the moment:

Latest versions:

Dated versions:

I'm happy to change those as necessary to make life easier,


> John Kaputin.
> On 3/21/07, John Kaputin (gmail) <jakaputin@gmail.com> wrote:
>         In the namespace document at
>         http://www.w3.org/2006/01/wsdl-extensions the URL for the
>         Dated Version of the XML schema file is: 
>         http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wsdl-extensions.xsd
>         In the new namespace document at
>         http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-extensions the URL for the Dated
>         Version is: 
>         http://www.w3.org/2007/03/wsdl/wsdl20-extensions.xsd
>         Is this correct...with the "20" in the file name?
>         Note, in both documents the file name used for the Latest
>         Version of the schema is just 'wsdl-extensions.xsd' (without
>         the "20").
>         John Kaputin.
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 13:56:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:04 UTC