W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > September 2006

Re: W3C Test Results for Woden M6

From: Youenn Fablet <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:58:32 +0200
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <451B80A8.2010802@crf.canon.fr>
Please find Canon's implementation results on the current test-suite.
I also added a preliminary assertion identification in case of errors. 
See error.xml for the current results.
I am quite unsure that we will have full broken assertion identification 
equality between Woden and Canon implementation:
    - some validation checks are obviously missing in our 
implementation, especially with regards to the HTTP binding
    - in some cases, a broken assertion may lead to break other 
assertions. It may then be implementation-dependent to identify which 
one is the root broken assertion.
We could find workarounds, especially for the last point, but I do not 
think that we should put a high bar there to declare victory.
More noticeable is that we fail on some good documents, some RPC-related 
documents for instance. I will try to investigate these cases.
Regards,
    Youenn

Arthur Ryman wrote:
>
> Jonathan,
>
> I completed my action item [1] and posted the test results on the 
> latest Woden milestone. Please update the reports.
>
> FYI, this version of Woden fails on SchemaId-1G and Storage-4G. Also, 
> I noticed some schema validation errors in the component model output 
> so Woden will probably be red on a few cases.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/09/21-ws-desc-minutes.html#action02
> [2] 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/woden/trunk/java/ant-test/test-suite-results.zip?revision=450059 
>
>
> Arthur Ryman,
> IBM Software Group, Rational Division
>
> blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
> phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
> assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
> fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
> mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca 



Received on Thursday, 28 September 2006 07:59:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:42 GMT