W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2006

Editorial >> WSDL 2.0 definitions v/s WSDL 2.0 descriptions

From: Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:25:42 -0700
Message-ID: <22bb8a4e0610102125s7043fdbbjab8223a125189b7b@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Hi,

I suggest a minor editorial change to the Part 1 [Core Language] regarding
the usage of  the terms "WSDL 2.0 definitions" and "WSDL 2.0 descriptions".
Quoting snippet from Section 2.1.2  [WSDL 2.0 definitions are represented in
XML by one or more WSDL 2.0 Information Sets (Infosets), that is one or more
description *element information item*s]
Quoting snippet from Section 4.2.1 [ Its actual value indicates that the
containing WSDL 2.0 document MAY contain qualified references to WSDL
2.0definitions in that namespace ]
These could be changed to WSDL 2.0 "descriptions" from "definitions" -
ensures consistent terminology.

HTH,
rgds,
Ram

-- 
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2006 04:25:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:42 GMT