W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2006

Re: [SPAM] Turning off http transfer coding

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:09:12 +0100
To: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <455DECB8.2000101@crf.canon.fr>

The other option in that case is, I guess, to not use a default transfer 
coding in the first place. Otherwise your solution sounds good to me.

JJ.

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>
> I presume omitting the {http transfer coding} property results in no 
> content coding being specified. How do I get that behavior if there is 
> an {http transfer coding default} in effect?
>
> Namely, is an empty value allowed for whttp:transferCoding and 
> whttp:transferCodingDefault?
>
> <binding … whttp:transferCodingDefault="gzip">
>
> <operation … wtthp:transferCodingDefault=””>
>
> A literal read says the value has to be a transfer coding token (which 
> doesn’t include an empty string). It’s also not clear whether an 
> implementation will attempt to specify an empty transfer coding in 
> this case, or whether it will simply ignore the transfer coding 
> property completely.
>
> **Jonathan Marsh** - http://www.wso2.com - 
> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>
Received on Friday, 17 November 2006 17:10:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:42 GMT