RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers

On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 10:33 +1100, Rogers, Tony wrote:
> Personally, I'd be interested in reviewing the Note, and I doubt I'm the
> only one. I'm even willing to offer any proofreading notes that occur to
> me during the review.
> 
> However, following the letter of the charter, I believe this WG is only
> responsible for WSDL 2.0, not 1.1, so I doubt we could object; or have I
> misunderstood that, Philippe?

And the WS Policy WG isn't responsible for WSDL 1.1. However, WSDL 1.1
has a lot more to do with WSDL 2.0 than WS-Policy 1.5, so I'm interested
in hearing the opinion of the Group at the minimum.

Philippe