W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2006

optionality of operation nodes in the interface et. al

From: Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:25:10 +0530
Message-ID: <22bb8a4e0603020255q41241eb3r6a758493f1fe9de@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Hi All,

Had a question on the WSDL 2.0 schema.
What is the reason for the optionality of "operation" nodes in an interface
? Similarly, the optionality of the input, output and faults for operations
etc ?
If I have an interface with no operation nodes within it, it wd be still
considered syntactically valid. [the behaviour is the same in WSDL
1.1schema as well].

rgds,
Menon
--
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 10:55:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:39 GMT