W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2006

Re: SparqlQuery-1G missing schemaLocation

From: Youenn Fablet <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:35:45 +0200
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Message-id: <447EB4F1.5010908@crf.canon.fr>

The sparql example is quite interesting for WSDL as it is one of the few 
documents to use the HTTP binding.
The use of schema constructs is on the other hand widely covered in 
other test cases.
Therefore, even if your implementation fails on the schema parts of the 
sparql example, I see value to compare the http bits that your 
implementation extracts with the one Woden or CRF parser extract.
That is also why, while I do not want generally to modify any real world 
wsdl test suite examples (and especially the sparql use of the http 
binding), changing a little bit a schema import is not a big deal to me 
(in the context of the wsdl test suite of course).
Youenn

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>
> In practice I donít see much difference between augmenting a testcase 
> with a schemaLocation attribute, or augmenting it with a catalog file. 
> Either way seems to be a bit intrusive. This testcase is riddled with 
> schemaLocation attributes Ė just missing the one I was looking for. 
> Letís ask the DAWG why it was omitted in this one instance.
>
> FWIW, as this testcase involves multiple levels of schema import, Iím 
> unlikely to ever pass this test even after implementing support for 
> parsing the HTTP binding namespace.
>
Received on Thursday, 1 June 2006 09:36:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:40 GMT