W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2006

Agenda: 26 January 2006 WS Description telcon

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:05:58 -0800
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E801638362@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

0.  Dial in information (members only) [.1]: 

See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon. 

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Jan/0020.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda 

1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is one of: 
      Jeff Mischkinsky, David Orchard, Dale Moberg, Youenn Fablet, 
      Kevin Canyang Liu, Glen Daniels, Allen Brookes, Paul Downey,
      Tom Jordahl, Anish Karmarkar, Sanjiva, Bijan Parsia

--------------------------------------------------------------------
2.  Approval of minutes: 
  - Jan 12 [.1]

[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jan/att-0022/2006011
2-ws-desc-minutes.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
3.  Review of Action items [.1]. 

?         2005-07-21: Pauld to write a proposal for a working group 
                      report for requirements for schema evolution 
                      following closure of LC124 
?         2005-10-20: Kendall to contact DAWG to ask for contribution to
                      test suite, due 2005-10-27. 
?         2005-11-10: Marsh to take the IRI issue to the CG, due
                      2005-11-16. 
DONE [.3] 2005-12-08: Amy to propose text warning about the knots one 
                      can tie oneself up in when writing an extension. 
?         2005-01-05: Jacek to detail (e.g. in a list) what constraints
                      of the component model are not enforced by the
WSDL
                      ontology. 
?         2005-01-05: Glen to write an outline for a test service and
                      send it to the list.
?         2006-01-12: Arthur to come up with an allocation for reviewing
                      assertions. 
DONE      2006-01-12: Marsh to send CR announcement to SOAPBuilders. 
DONE [.4] 2006-01-12: Hugo to find uses of x-www... media types in W3C
Recs. 
DONE [.6] 2006-01-12: Jacek to investigate with SWDBP WG the status of 
                      part-whole ontology. 
DONE [.5] 2006-01-12: JacekK to contact XMLP WG on blessing 
                      http://www.w3.org/2005/10/wsdl- 
                      rdf#SOAPMessageExchangePattern to point.

Current Editorial Action Items

Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2]. 

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jan/0046.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jan/0028.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jan/0051.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jan/0052.html


---------------------------------------------------------------------
4.  Administrivia
 a. Feb meeting (Cannes) draft schedule available [.1]
    - Registration [.2] 
    - Hotel Registration extended [.3]
 b. Future FTF meetings: East Coast in late May?
 c. Interop event?
 d. Rechartering the WG (Hugo).

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Nov/0001.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/tp6groups.html
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TP2006/
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Jan/0019.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
5.  Issue CR002: Do <import> and <include> support extensibility
elements?
                 [.1]
  - PARTIAL RESOLUTION: import/include will allow extensibility 
                        (make schema agree with spec)
  - Amy's proposed text [.2].

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR002
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jan/0046.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
6.  Issue CR003: wsdl20-adjuncts vs RFC 4288 [.1]
  - Tending towards closing with no action as this "discouraged"
    media type is in wide practical use and used in other W3C
    Recommendations.
  - Hugo's analysis [.2]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR003
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jan/0028.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
7.  Issue CR004: <appInfo> for the WSDL [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR004

-----------------------------------------------------------------
8.  Issue CR005: Built in XML Schema types [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR005

-----------------------------------------------------------------
9.  Issue CR006: Correction for assertion BindingFault-0058 [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR006

-----------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue CR007: Assertion required for property <constraint> [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR007

-----------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue CR008: Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 
                 SOAP 1.1 Binding: example @ section 2.4 [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR008

-----------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue 283: Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping: General comments [.1]
  - Jacek's response [.2]
  - Thread debates whether XSLT or prose should be normative.
  - Awaiting proposed resolution.

[.1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.h
tml#283
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Dec/0031.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue 284: Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping: Comments by Section
[.1]
  - Awaiting proposed resolution.

[.1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.h
tml#284

-----------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue 286: Reusing Part-Whole ontology? [.1]
  - Whether to reuse this ontology [.2]
  - Awaiting proposed resolution.

[.1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.h
tml#286
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jan/0052.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue 287: Modularization of the ontology? [.1]
  - Awaiting proposed resolution.

[.1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.h
tml#287

-----------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue 288: WSDL RDF mapping issue: coordination with SOAP WG [.1]
  - Awaiting proposed resolution.

[.1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.h
tml#288

-----------------------------------------------------------------
17. CR testing issues/progress
  - Feature list draft [.1]

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Nov/0023.html
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 18:06:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:38 GMT