W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2006

Re: SOAP binding representation in the component model

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:54:44 +0100
To: Lawrence Mandel <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Message-Id: <1137588884.3940.37.camel@localhost>

Lawrence, I expect that the word "property" is used to mean "a property
of a component", like Description component has properties {interface}
and {bindings} etc. The component model can be extended like this by
WSDL extensions.

In other words, I don't think it has anything to do with Properties (as
in Features&Properties).

Best regards,

Jacek 

On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 17:18 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> 
> The WSDL 2.0 adjunts document specifies the rules for specifying a
> SOAP binding. I'm clear with how SOAP bindings are represented in the
> XML model. I'm unclear about how SOAP bindings are represented in the
> component model. Taking section 5.4 about SOAP version as an example,
> I can specify the SOAP version on the XML model by specifying the
> attribute 
> 
> wsoap:version="xs:string" 
> 
> on the binding element. According to section 5.4.2, 
> 
> The SOAP protocol specification adds the following property to the
> WSDL component model (as defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language]):  
> {soap version} REQUIRED. A xs:string, to the Bindingcomponent.  
> 
> Does this mean that the SOAP version is specified in the component
> model using a Property (note that property is lower case in the above
> description)? If this is the case, is the ref the SOAP namespace, the
> URL of the adjuncts document, or something else? Am I completely
> barking up the wrong tree here? 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> Lawrence Mandel
> Software Developer
> IBM Rational Software
> Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814   Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
> lmandel@ca.ibm.com
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2006 12:54:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:38 GMT