Re: Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping

On Jan 9, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote:
[snip]
> Although I think this makes obvious sense as an internal strategy, I'm 
> a
> little uneasy with the idea that you would only be specifying mapping B
> in the published mapping document.

I was for A to RDF myself :) Talk to Jacek.
[snip]

> More pragmatically, since the WSDL 2.0 --> RDF mapping is from one
> machine-processable language to another, I was assuming (hoping?) that
> the mapping itself would be also defined in a machine-processable
> language (such as XSLT for example).
[snip]
I see. Possible. A bit weird, but possible.

Cheers,
Bijan.