W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2006

Re: Binding, Service, Modularization, Extensibility, and Location assertions

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:27:32 -0500
To: Lawrence Mandel <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: woden-dev@ws.apache.org, www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF2AB2F09F.E471F1A5-ON852570F1.005EB0FF-852570F1.005FE477@ca.ibm.com>
Lawrence,

Thx. I'll review and apply the patch. You only need to include the patches 
for the source specs, e.g. wsdl20.xml, since the other files are 
generated.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca



Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
01/06/2006 05:14 PM

To
www-ws-desc@w3.org
cc
woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Binding, Service, Modularization, Extensibility, and Location assertions







I've created and attached a patch for the WSDL20 folder that updates 
component-assertion-table.xml, document-assertion-table.xml, and 
wsdl20.xml to include assertions ids and entries in the assertion tables 
for sections 2.9-2.20, 4, 6, 7, and 8 of the WSDL 2.0 specification. I 
broke the assertions down as best I could into document and component 
assertions. When in doubt (there are some assertions that are really for 
service implementations) I marked them as component. It may be better to 
create a new type of assertion table for service implementations. 



Thanks, 

Lawrence Mandel


Received on Monday, 9 January 2006 17:28:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:38 GMT