W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2006

RE: Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping

From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:53:19 -0500
Message-ID: <A5EEF5A4F0F0FD4DBA33093A0B075590097B683A@tayexc18.americas.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Cc: "WS-Description WG" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>

Okay.  It would probably be good to include your explanation below in
the document, since others may have the same question.

THanks,
David Booth


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacek Kopecky [mailto:jacek.kopecky@deri.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 6:26 AM
> To: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
> Cc: WS-Description WG; Bijan Parsia
> Subject: RE: Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 17:21 -0500, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
> wrote:
> > The rewritten text is clearer.  But now I'm wondering: If WSDL 
> > document A imports/includes WSDL documents B and C, will the RDF 
> > mapping for A include the information from B and C?
> 
> Hi David, 
> 
> yes the transformed document will contain information from B 
> and C as the Description component contains all the 
> included/imported interfaces/bindings/services.
> 
> Any interface only contains the "declared" operations in the 
> component model, but the description component contains all 
> stuff after include/import processing.
> 
> A few things are lost in import/include, as far as I can see 
> - documentation and maybe even extensions of the 
> imported/included wsdl:description elements. Not sure about 
> features and properties yet, aren't that far. 8-)
> 
> Jacek
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 15:56:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:38 GMT