W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > December 2006

Agenda: 21 December 2006 WS Description telcon

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:36:34 -0800
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <013d01c723ce$e6fca2a0$3401a8c0@DELLICIOUS>

0.  Dial in information (members only) [.1]:

See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before
the start of the telcon.

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Dec/0006.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda

1. Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
      Anish Karmarkar, Glen Daniels, Charlton Baretto,
      Roberto Chinnici, Gilbert Pilz, Jean-Jacques Moreau
      Philippe le Hegaret, Tony Rogers, Tom Jordahl, Amy Lewis

--------------------------------------------------------------------
2.  Approval of minutes:
  - Dec 14 [.1]

[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/att-0059/20061214-ws
-desc-minutes.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
3.  Review of Action items [.1].

[Interop]
?         2006-11-30: [interop] John Kaputin to create a test case 
                      with "required=false". 
?         2006-12-14: [interop] Jonathan to fix transferCodings - 
                      add control group

[WG]
DONE [.3] 2006-10-12: pdowney to review the Schema WG note on versioning 
                      in 1.1.
?         2006-12-14: Arthur to examine the equivalence of 0006 and 0014
?         2006-12-14: plh to check with XMLP whether they should be 
                      interested in 204 as well
?         2006-12-14: plh to come up with a more detailed proposal for 
                      CR112 if possible

Current Editorial Action Items

Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2].

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0062.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
4.  Administrivia
  - Year end telcons
    + Dec 28: cancel
    + Jan 4: resume telcon
  - LC reviews
    + Databinding [.1]
    + Policy [.2], Charlton's draft comments [.3]
  - WSDL 1.1 component designators
    + Do we have a preference? [.4]
  - Interchange format draft Note [.5]

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Nov/0010.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/0127.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0055.html
[.4]  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0049.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0044.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
5.  MTOM Description
  - Paul's proposal [.1]
  - Jonathan/Asir's counter-proposal [.2]

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/0029.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0016.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
6.  Issue CR108: Do MessageLabel-0006 and MessageLabel-0014 state the 
                 same requirement? [.1]
  - Arthur agrees [.2]
  - Amy recommends removing the third assertion [.3], and points out
    The lack of restrictions enforcing a one-to-one correspondence 
    between binding operations and interface operations.
  - ACTION: Arthur to examine the equivalence of 0006 and 0014
  - Amy's analysis [.4]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR108
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/0085.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0033.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/0058.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
7.  Issue CR111: Mapping WSDL meps to the HTTP binding [.1]
  - ACTION: plh to check with XMLP whether they should be interested 
            in 204 as well

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR111

-----------------------------------------------------------------
8.  Issue CR112: HTTP Location property definition [.1]
  - ACTION: plh to come up with a more detailed proposal for CR112 
            if possible
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR112

-----------------------------------------------------------------
9.  Issue CR114: Mapping WSDL MEPs to SOAP MEPs [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR114

-----------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue CR115: Suggested editorial change for assertion Import-0072 [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR115

-----------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue CR116: 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the 
                 http location [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR116

-----------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue CR117: Re: 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the 
                 http location [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR117

-----------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue CR118: Suggested removal of 2 assertions [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR118

-----------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue CR119: Missing attribute in section 6.2 [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR119

-----------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue CR120: SOAP Response and IRI style [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR120

-----------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue CR121: WSDL enhancement request [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR121

-----------------------------------------------------------------
17. Issue CR122: Clarification about ignoreUncited behaviour [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR122

-----------------------------------------------------------------
18. Issue CR123: HTTP Method selection [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR123

-----------------------------------------------------------------
19. Issue CR124: editorial: features and properties in "xml 
                 representation" sections [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR124

-----------------------------------------------------------------
20. Issue CR125: problem with pattern attribute definition? [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR125

-----------------------------------------------------------------
21. Issue CR126: Re: New interchange results [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR126

-----------------------------------------------------------------
22. Issue CR127: Message Dispatching Primer Section [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR127

-----------------------------------------------------------------
23. Issue CR128: Interface Inheritance Section [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR128

-----------------------------------------------------------------
24. Issue CR129: RE: Comment on Fragment [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR129

-----------------------------------------------------------------
25. Issue CR130: Question on double curly braces with HTTP [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR130

-----------------------------------------------------------------
26. Issue CR131: Clarifying assertion for HTTP Location [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR131

-----------------------------------------------------------------
27. Issue CR021: Re: WSDL describing Interface operation safety [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR021
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 00:36:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:43 GMT