RE: Clarifying assertion for HTTP Location

I don't think this binding supports mapping an output or fault to an HTTP
request message.  It only supports the in-out, in-only, and robust-in-only
MEPs, in which the input message maps to the HTTP request.

 

Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

 

  _____  

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of John Kaputin (gmail)
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 3:56 AM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Cc: woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Clarifying assertion for HTTP Location

 

Part 2 section 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the {http
location} property.

This section contains the assertion:

"Strings enclosed within single curly braces MUST be element names from the
instance data of the input message."

I assume 'input message' here refers generically to any input data for the
HTTP request (i.e. to a WSDL input, output or fault message element).   To
make this clearer and to keep it consistent with the description at
hyperlink "instance data", perhaps you could restate this something like:

"Strings enclosed within single curly braces MUST be element names from the
instance data of the input, output or fault message."

regards,
John Kaputin.