W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > September 2005

[draft] Agenda, 26-27 September 2005 WS Desc FTF, Palo Alto

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:09:09 -0700
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E8208170@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Logistics [1] and dial-in details [2]

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/sep-f2f.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Sep/0013.html

------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday 26 September
------------------------------------------------------------------

09:00 Opening formalities
    a. Introductions & logistics
    b. Assign scribes:
       TBD
    c. Action Item [3] Review:
       TBD    
    d. Future meetings
       Looking for venue for January
       Tech Plenary week of Feb 27, Cannes

 [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions

09:20 Issue LC315: HTTP binding: HTTP Header component's {element}
                 property's declaration [3]
  - Proposal from Jonathan [4]
  - Proposal from Jacek on escaping [5]
  - Waiting for proposal from Hugo

[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC315
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0008.html
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0017.html

09:50 Issue LC321: SOAP binding: clarify that the lack {soap mep} value
                 is an error [6]
  - Proposal from Asir [7]

[6] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC321
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0011.html

10:10 Issue LC326: HTTP binding: whis is {http authentication scheme} 
                   an xs:string? [8]

[8] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC326

10:20 Issue LC327: HTTP binding: {http authentication realm} is 
                   Required [9]

[9] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC327

10:30 Break

10:50 RDF Mapping (report from Jacek?)

12:00 Lunch

13:00 Issue LC319: SOAP and HTTP binding: definition of {soap fault
                   code} and wsoap:code [11]
   - Proposal from Hugo [12].

[11] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC319
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0012.html 

14:00 Issue LC339: Comments on WSDL SOAP Binding Extension section of
                   Adjuncts from WS-Addressing WG [13]

[13] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC339

15:00 Break

15:20 Issue LC340: Comments on WSDL SOAP Binding Extension section of 
                   Adjuncts from WS-Addressing WG [14]

[14] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC340

16:00 Issue LC323: HTTP binding: Use of HTTP accept headers [15]
  - Thoughts from DaveO [16]

[15] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC323
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0007.html

17:00 Adjourn

------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday 27 September
------------------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Issue LC330: WSDL 2: operation styles should mandate content 
                   model [20]

[20] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC330

09:20 Issue LC331: WSDL 2: adjuncts description of #any msg content 
                   model unclear [21]

[21] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC331

09:40 Issue LC333: WSDL 2: binding defaults not component model
                   properties? [22]

[22] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC333

10:00 Issue LC334: WSDL 2: HTTP binding error reason phrase 
                   unnecessary [23]

[23] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC334

10:30 Break

10:50 {http * serialization issues}
    - LC332: WSDL 2: HTTP input, output, fault serialization in 
             the wrong place [24]
    - LC337: fault serialization [25]
    - LC338: limitations of {http output serialization} [26]

[24] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC332
[25] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC337
[26] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC338

12:00 Lunch

13:20 Issue LC336: LC ISSUE from WSA: Clarify applicability of 
                   wsdx:Interface and wsdx:Binding [27]

[27] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC336

15:00 Break

15:20 Issue LC335: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 
                   2.0 [28]

[28] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC335

16:00 Issue LC343: Comments on Web Services Description Language 
                   (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 0: Primer [29]

[29] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC343

17:00 Adjourn




-----------------------------------------------------------------
On hold:

Issue LC301: {soap action} granularity [30]
  - Waiting on response to Jonathan's mail to the WS-A WG [31].

[30] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC301
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0003.html
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2005 06:09:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:37 GMT