W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > September 2005

RE: SOAP and HTTP binding: definition of {soap fault code} and wsoap:code

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 09:24:22 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A508D091BA@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Hugo, the WG had a hard time understanding precisely what needs to be changed.  I took an action to ask you for a more explicit proposal, which action I hereby discharge ;-).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:12 AM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: SOAP and HTTP binding: definition of {soap fault code} and
> wsoap:code
> 
> This is an issue which has already been addressed (LC130[1]) and
> editorially implemented incorrectly.
> 
> It therefore is editorial. Details follow.
> 
> Part 2's section 5.7 Binding Faults defines:
> 
>      * {soap fault code} OPTIONAL. A xs:QName, to the Binding Fault
>        component. The value of this property identifies a possible
> SOAP
>        fault for the operations in scope. If this property is empty,
> no
>        assertion is made about the value of the SOAP fault code.
> 
> [...]
> 
>      * wsoap:code OPTIONAL attribute information item
> 
>           * A [local name] of code
> 
>           * A [namespace name] of
> "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl/soap"
> 
>           * A type of union of xs:QName and xs:token where the allowed
> token
>             value is "#any"
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> 
> 
>           Property                             Value
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                            The actual value of the code attribute
> 
>     {soap fault code}      information item if present and if its
> value  
>                            is not "#any"; otherwise empty.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Why do we need "#any" as a possible value if the wsoap:code attribute
> is optional?
> 
> It turns out that the resolution to LC130 was not properly
> implemented:
> 
> * Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com> [2005-06-04 01:08-0700]
> >   Issue LC130: Binding fault defaulting?
> >     RESOLUTION: wsoap:subcode and wsoap:code will be optional,
> >               wsoap:subcode and wsoap:code will allow #any as a
> token,
> >               missing attribute will map to #any in the component
> model,
> >               #any => no assertion is made about the value,
> >               http:code will be similarly modified.
> 
> -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jun/0003
> 
> wsoap:subcode, wsoap:code and whttp:code need to be revised to reflect
> the correct resolution of LC130.
> 
>   1. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC130
> --
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Friday, 2 September 2005 16:24:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:37 GMT