W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2005

Re: Attempted review of SPARQL Protocol LC Draft

From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:50:04 +0200
To: paul.downey@bt.com
Cc: jmarsh@microsoft.com, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20051028065004.GI2498@w3.org>
* paul.downey@bt.com <paul.downey@bt.com> [2005-10-27 17:12+0100]
> I did mention this out in my review:
> 
> > As discussed previously within this Working group, the service
> > is interesting in that the operation is bound to both HTTP and 
> > SOAP 1.2 over HTTP.  In the case of HTTP, the operation is 
> > bound twice using the whttp:method attribute to distinguish 
> > between the GET and POST instances, both accepting input as
> > application/x-www-form-urlencoded parameters.
> 
> I thought we had discussed binding the operation twice
> to GET and POST during the Palo Alto (TIBCO) F2F, and decided
> it was OK, but I'm now questioning my memory and the WSDL 2.0
> model in my head. Sorry, I should have flagged this up more 
> strongly during my walk-through on last week's call.

Oh, so I missed both your comment and the discussion then! Anyway, if
this has been considered, then I'm happy.

Sorry about the confusion.

Cheers,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Friday, 28 October 2005 06:49:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:37 GMT