W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2005

Multiple binding of an operation (was Re: Attempted review of SPARQL Protocol LC Draft)

From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:51:42 +0100
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Cc: paul.downey@bt.com, jmarsh@microsoft.com, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20051104105142.GG22734@w3.org>
* Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org> [2005-11-03 23:28+0100]
> Hi, sorry that I only just noticed this, but if we can have multiple
> binding operation components with the same name, we need to update the
> fragment identifier for these components to be able to address each
> particular one of them. This is an issue important for the RDF mapping.

That's a good point.

> I cannot think at this moment of any distinguishing characteristic of
> these same-named binding operations that can readily be used in the
> component designators, though. And I thought that different bindings of
> one operation can be done in different bindings, and these can then be
> provided by the same endpoint, so the SPARQL WSDL can be refactored and
> we can (again?) forbid multiple different binding operation components
> with the same name.

I'm wondering if this means that we are going to require in this case
a name property for binding operations to distinguish them.

> I think we need email discussion before the f2f so that this can be
> readily handled there.

Agreed.

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 10:51:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:37 GMT