- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 09:50:48 -0700
- To: "WS-Description WG" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005May/0039.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Jean-Jacques Moreau, Anish Karmarkar, Jeff Mischkinsky,
Ugo Corda, Roberto Chinnici, Glen Daniels, Bijan Parsia,
Tom Jordahl
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- May 19 telcon [.1]
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/att-0066/2005051
9-ws-desc-minutes.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
?* 2004-11-11: Anish to propose additions to the test suite for
the purpose of interoperability testing,
due 2005-05-12.
? 2005-03-31: Marsh to take on (or recommend closing) Bijan's AI
to produce a component/property table via XSLT,
due 2005-05-28.
? 2005-04-21: Pauld to craft, publish Common Schema structures
to WG for review for publication as WG Note,
due 2005-05-28.
DONE [.4] 2005-04-21: Hugo to continue to look at IRI style/URI style,
due 2005-05-26. (LC74a)
?* 2005-04-22: Amy to provide examples for the advanced section
of the primer. Amy to send them to Kevin and test
materials to Arthur, due 2005-05-19. (LC61c)
DONE [.3] 2005-04-22: Amy to investigate a solution, due 2005-05-19
(LC74c)
?* 2005-05-05: Sanjiva to writeup a proposal for LC71,
due 2005-05-26.
?* 2005-05-12: Glen to add scoping example to primer,
due 2005-05-26.
? 2005-05-19: Umit to provide #none for Primer, due 2005-06-01.
? 2005-05-19: DaveO to ressurect option to indicate GET more
directly, due 2005-06-01.
Outstanding editorial work:
? 2005-04-28: Arthur to introduce specialized markup for
components and properties.
DONE [.5] 2005-05-12: Primer editors to remove section 7.1.2 - we don't
define scoping rules for extension elements.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/actions.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0068.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0077.html
[.5]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.ht
ml#adv-extensibility
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Upcoming FTF dates:
- May 31 - June 1 Berlin
+ Registration [.1]. Logistics [.2]
+ Draft agenda content:
= deliverables status
= Last Call issues (as listed below)
= un-accepted comments
= Async TF report
= Common schema structures note
= RDF mapping update
= FTF schedule
- Call for any proposals or issues not on the issues list
+ Formal objections compromises are the only ones I know about.
b. Alternative schema languages Note [.3]
c. Zed, MathML, etc. [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/wsdf2fberlin5/
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/jun-f2f.html
[.3]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/altschemalangs.h
tml
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005May/0038.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Incoming Last Call Issues [.1]. Comments list [.2]
- Binding fault defaulting? (Jacek) [.3]
- Notational convention abuse (Jonathan, editorial) [.4]
- WSDL 2.0 2005-05-10 Working Draft Discrepancies (editorial) [.5]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0069.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0078.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0081.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Completed editorial issues (proposal to close)
- LC97
- LC126
- LC129
------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue LC75j: {safety} has a default, @safety doesn't [.1]
- I believe this has been subsumed by LC97 [.2]?
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75j
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC97
------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue LC89j: Use namespaces to avoid local-name conflicts [.1]
- Need a volunteer to make a proposal
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89j
------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue LC74a: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (a) [.1]
- URI Style vs. IRI Style
- Proposal from Hugo [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC74a
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0077.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue LC80: XML Extension Components are not Described [.1]
- Component designators for extensions [.2, .3], check with Hugo
whether he has the editorial direction he needs.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC80
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0035.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0057.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue LC74c: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (c) [.1]
- Proposal from Amy [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC74c
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0068.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue LC124: Support of evolution of messages described in Schema
1.0 [.1]
- Start sketching out problem and solution spaces.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC124
------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue LC117: Problem with Service References:
elementFormDefault="qualified" prevents restriction [.1]
- Proposal from Umit [.2], no response from WS-A WG.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC117
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0062.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
14. MEP-related issues:
- LC79: Make sure in-only mep is supported in wsdl soap12 binding [.1]
+ Need volunteer to check, perhaps make a proposal.
- LC101: message level binding? [.2]
+ Is there interest in seeing a concrete proposal?
- LC102: What is the SOAP MEP for In-only [.3]
+ Is there interest in seeing a concrete proposal?
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC79
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC101
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC102
------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Operation Name Mapping issues
- Review ONMR rewrite as Best Practice [.1]
- Issue LC82: Operation Name Mapping Requirement Bug [.2]
+ Need volunteer to make a concrete proposal.
- Issue LC84b: Operation Name Mapping Requirement has the wrong
granularity [.3]
+ Proposals from Hugo [.4], Sanjiva [.5], defer to FTF.
- Issue LC84c: Operation Name Mapping Requirement doesn't go far
enough [.6]
+ Need volunteer to investigate.
[.1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html#Serv
ice_OperationName
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC82
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC84b
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Feb/0035.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0134.html
[.6] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC84bc
------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue LC75c: Remove {safety} property [.1]
- Options:
1) Status quo
2) Remove safety
3) Proposal from Umit to move safety to an extension [.2]
4) Expect GET proposal from DaveO
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75c
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0059.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Issue LC71: default interface/operation/@pattern [.1]
- Awaiting proposal from Sanjiva.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC71
-----------------------------------------------------------------
18. Proposals addressing formal objections.
- Operation Name Mapping (Sanjiva) [.1]
- F&P (Glen) [.2]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0134.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0069.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
19. Issue LC75x: Complete or remove App D [.1]
- Some initial options:
Option 0: Close issue with no action
Option 1: Remove app D
Option 2: Retitle and edit to emphasize it's far from exhaustive
Option 3: Strip down to D.4 only.
Option 4: Move to primer (includes option 2)
Option 5: Add exhaustive material.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75x
------------------------------------------------------------------
20. Issue LC98: {soap mep} property and SOAP 1.1 Binding [.1]
- Issue contains a proposal
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC98
------------------------------------------------------------------
21. Issue LC114: In-Multi-Out MEP [was "WSDL 2.0 specification"] [.1]
- Issue text lays out several options
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC114
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2005 16:51:01 UTC