On Tue, 03 May 2005 18:21:09 +0200 Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org> wrote: > I checked the editors' draft at [1] and it isn't clear that ONMR is not > currently a requirement, it certainly does contain a "MUST" in it. I > guess this has not been implemented yet or I have the wrong URI for the > editors' draft. 8-) It simply hasn't been updated yet. It's one of the existing AIs. As TIBCO is one of the signatories to the formal objection, which has been satisfied by making the ONMR into a best practice, I've been waiting for the update with some anticipation. Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.comReceived on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 16:31:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:36 GMT