Henry, You raised an issue against the "Assigning Media Types to Binary Data in XML" Last Call WD [1] in your email at [2] (comment 2c). This was accepted by the WSD WG [3] as issue 275 [4]. The bug in example 1 has been fixed. The type is now an extension of xs:base64Binary and not a restriction. The WG explicitly wanted to use xs:base64Binary instead of xmime:base64Binary to illustrate that fact that depending on the needs either could be used. The type xmime:base64Binary is defined for convenience. These changes are reflected in the latest editors draft at [5]. I hope this addresses the issue that you raised, to your satisfaction. Thanks and regards. -Anish Karmarkar On behalf of the WSD WG -- [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xml-media-types-20041102/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-media-types/2004Nov/0011.html [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/ [4] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html#x275 [5] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/media-types/xml-media-types.htmlReceived on Friday, 11 March 2005 02:01:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:14:58 GMT