RE: Questions on Binding Operation Changes

I also remember that we made a decision quite a while ago to add
<infault> & <outfault> under binding operation. It would be good this
decision be reflected in part one. Once part one is fixed, I will update
the primer accordingly.

Best Regards,
Kevin
  

 


  _____  

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, Mar 10, 2005 07:45 AM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Questions on Binding Operation Changes



I was reviewing the updates to Binding Operation and noticed the
following: 

1. In 2.11.1 [1] shouldn't there be a {fault references} property? Add
the following text: 

{fault references} OPTIONAL. A set of Binding Fault Reference components



2. In 2.11.2 [2] shouldn't there be <infault> and <outfault> elements?
Use the following text: 

      [ <input /> | <output /> | <infault> | <outfault> | <feature /> |
<property /> ]*


[1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?cont
ent-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#Binding_Operation_details 
[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?cont
ent-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#Binding_Operation_XMLRep 

Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/