W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Requirements for one-way MEP

From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:03:13 -0700
Message-Id: <D26C7DDC-78E0-41E3-B5D3-A060F6C269CC@bea.com>
Cc: Web Services Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, public-ws-async-tf@w3.org, www-ws-cg@w3.org, Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
To: "michael.mahan@nokia.com> <michael.mahan@nokia.com" <michael.mahan@nokia.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org

Mike: I'll ask on next week's telecon.

Addressing WG: Please see below WRT WSDL's request to start a one-way  
MEP; we'll discuss whether we have anything to add next week (Reply- 
To set to the Addressing list to keep the cross-chatter down).

Regards,


On Jun 21, 2005, at 10:35 AM, <michael.mahan@nokia.com>  
<michael.mahan@nokia.com> wrote:

> Thanks Glen,
>
> Mark, does WS-Addressing have any additional requirements or scoping
> statements to this?
>
> Thx,
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-cg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-cg-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of ext Glen Daniels
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 1:38 PM
> To: www-ws-cg@w3.org
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; public-ws-async-tf@w3.org
> Subject: Requirements for one-way MEP
>
>
>
>
> Greetings, CG:
>
> As Jonathan mentioned in [1], the WS-Description group have requested
> the specification of a one-way SOAP MEP.  I believe the deliverables
> here are as follows:
>
> * A SOAP one-way MEP, which describes a simple "fire and forget"
> single-message pattern, with an appropriate URI and specification  
> as per
> the SOAP 1.2 binding framework.
>
> * A binding of this MEP to HTTP.  This may involve changing the  
> existing
> HTTP binding, or may involve generating a new one.
>
> * A clear description of how each party (sender and receiver)  
> determines
> which MEP is in use.
>
> The requirements for this are pretty much spelled out above, except  
> for
> one more (fairly light/intangible one) that I would add:
>
> * Should if possible take into account the WS-I work in this area.
>
> I thought there might be more to it, but I think that's about it!  If
> anyone from WSDL/async thinks there are more requirements, please  
> chime
> in.
>
> --Glen
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-cg/2005Jun/0000.html
>
>
>


--
Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2005 18:03:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:36 GMT