W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2005

Re: Suggestion to improve an XML syntax tree

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:20:08 -0400
To: John Kaputin <KAPUTIN@uk.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF95B7CEA9.57DA7284-ON8525703B.007376B3-8525703B.007531B3@ca.ibm.com>

Technically, Part 1 correct since even XSD is an extension, however it is 
certainly a favoured extension.

We recently decided to allow multliple <description> elements (to simplify 
NL support).

The Primer is wrong in my opinion since there is no requirement to have 
the xs: elements come first. A more accurate tree would be:

                <documentation />*
                (<xs:import namespace="xs:anyURI" schemaLocation= 
"xs:anyURI"?/> |
                <xs:schema targetNamespace="xs:anyURI" /> |
                [other extension elements])*

Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/

John Kaputin <KAPUTIN@uk.ibm.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
07/07/2005 06:57 AM


Suggestion to improve an XML syntax tree

At the start of Part 1: Section 3 'Types' is the following XML syntax 

    <documentation />*
    [extension elements]*

In the WSDL 2.0 Primer, Section 2.3 'More on Message Types', the following
more descriptive XML syntax tree is used:

<documentation />?
<xs:import namespace="xs:anyURI" schemaLocation= "xs:anyURI"?/>*
<xs:schema targetNamespace="xs:anyURI" />*

[extension elements]*

Perhaps Part 1: Section 3 'Types' should use the same XML syntax tree
that's used in the Primer, especially as it goes on to discuss <xs:import>
and <xs:schema>.

John Kaputin
Received on Monday, 11 July 2005 21:20:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:55 UTC