W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2005

RE: Primer Last Call and LC 124

From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 18:49:00 -0700
Message-ID: <2BA6015847F82645A9BB31C7F9D641651BBCFD@uspale20.pal.sap.corp>
To: "Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com>, "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
+1. 
 
I really do not see the reason why Primer should be delayed with respect
to LC124. 
 
--umit

 

________________________________

	From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Liu, Kevin
	Sent: Wednesday, Jul 06, 2005 11:10 AM
	To: David Orchard; www-ws-desc@w3.org
	Subject: RE: Primer Last Call and LC 124
	
	
	Hi David,
	 
	Are there any particular sections that you see serious problems
that can not be resolved until LC124 is resolved? 
	 
	I would suggest that we put an editor's notes in the related
sections to indicate the issue.  Holding the LC process is not
necessary, IMHO.
	 

	Best Regards,
	Kevin
	  

	 


________________________________

		From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard
		Sent: Wednesday, Jul 06, 2005 8:54 AM
		To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
		Subject: Primer Last Call and LC 124
		
		

		Hi all,

		 

		I would like to time the publication of the Primer with
LC124 resolution.  I would like the primer to reflect how we resolve
LC124, so I would like to delay going to Last Call on the Primer until
then.  I will certainly contribute update/examples based on LC124.

		 

		Cheers,

		Dave
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2005 01:48:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:36 GMT