W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2005

Agenda, 7 July 2005 WS Desc telcon

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:25:56 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A508211FA1@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

0.  Dial in information (members only) [.1]:

See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Jul/0002.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda

1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
      Jeff Mischkinsky, Bijan Parsia, Kevin Liu, David Orchard,
      Dale Moberg, Hugo Haas, Rebecca Bergersen, Amy Lewis

--------------------------------------------------------------------
2.  Approval of minutes:
  - June 30 telcon [.1]

[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jul/att-0015/2005063
0-ws-desc-minutes.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
3.  Review of Action items [.1].  Editorial actions at [.2].
?         2005-04-21: Pauld to craft, publish Common Schema structures
                      to WG for review for publication as WG Note,
                      due 2005-06-28.
DROP      2005-05-12: Glen to add scoping example to primer,
                      due eob 2005-06-16.
DROP      2005-05-19: Umit to provide #none for Primer,
                      due eob 2005-06-16.
?         2005-06-16: Amy to provide test cases for MEPs not described
                      in Part 2, due 2005-07.
DONE [.3] 2005-06-30: DaveO to write up a new proposal for LC124

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/actions.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jun/0097.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
4.  Administrivia
  a. Upcoming FTF dates:
   - July 20, July 21 registration [.1] logistics [.2]
   - Agenda topics:
     + Common Schema Structures Note
     + RDF Mapping deliverable
  b. Next Round Publication details:
   - Primer Last Call (dependent upon LC124 [.3])
   - Core (dependent upon LC124, objections)
   - Adjuncts (dependent upon objections)
   - SOAP 1.1 Binding (done)
   - Alternative schema languages Note [.3] (dependent upon issues
below)
   - Unfortunately, it looks like only the SOAP 1.1 Binding is truly
ready
     for a vote to move to last call, so we'll postpone such a vote.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/wsdesc0705/
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/jul-f2f.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jul/0008.html
[.4]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/altschemalangs.h
tml

-----------------------------------------------------------------
5.  Alternative Schema Language issues [.1]
  - multiple definitions of the same type/element
    + Bijan's proposal [.3]
  - discussion of operations with types that span multiple languages
    + Bijan to propose.

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005May/0083.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jun/0075.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jun/0096.html

------------------------------------------------------------------
6.  Unaddressed LC comments:
  - LC5a: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues 
          (a) [.1]
          Objection [.2]  Jonathan to provide more detail.
  - LC5f: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues 
          (f) [.3]
          Objection [.2]  Suggest we uphold our current design on the 
          first point (wants classes of conformant processors), second 
          point has been fixed - need to notify commenter.
  - LC9:  How does the Operation Name Mapping Requirement [.4]
          Believe we've satisfied the objection.  See latest mail [.15]
  - LC51: Editorial last call review comments [.5]
          Objection [.6] Asked for more details [.16]
  - LC73: Raising an ugly issue again [.7]
          Objection [.8]  Single interface per service, we've gone over 
          this before, suggest not attempting to satisfy the comment.
  - LC75f: Allow extension attributes on RPC local element children [.9]
           Objection [.10]  Jonathan is looking into this.
  - LC75v: Remove "Processor Conformance" [.11]
           Objection [.10]  Fixed, but commentor needs to be notified.
  - LC76a: MEPs should support addressing mechanism [.12]
           Objection [.10]  My notes say that Roberto is looking into
this?
  - LC76c: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (Part 2) (c) [.13]
           Objection [.10]  Proposal [.17]
  - LC76d: Replace ADD with header construct [.14]
           Objection [.10]  Needs discussion.
  - LC91: XML Schema comment "T2" on WSDL 2.0 [.18]
          Objection? and proposal [.19]
  - LC96: wsdl:import semantics is different from xs:import [.20]
          Objection? and proposal [.21]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC5a
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC5f
[.3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005May/0020
.html
[.4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC9
[.5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC51
[.6]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005May/0021
.html
[.7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC73
[.8]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005May/0020
.html
[.9] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75f
[.10]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005May/0091
.html
[.11] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75v
[.12] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC76a
[.13] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC76c
[.14] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC76d
[.15]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Jun/0029
.html
[.16]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Jun/0030
.html
[.17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jun/0093.html
[.18] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC91
[.19]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Jun/0003
.html
[.20] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC96
[.21]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Jun/0004
.html

------------------------------------------------------------------
7.  Issue LC124: Support of evolution of messages described in Schema
1.0 [.1]
  - Continue discussion.  Latest summary of options [.2]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC124
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jun/0097.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
8.  Proposals addressing formal objections.
  - F&P (Glen) [.1]

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0069.html
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2005 22:26:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:36 GMT