W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2005

RE: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service

From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:31:04 -0500
To: rph@nesc.ac.uk
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, paul.downey@bt.com
Message-Id: <1106947864.3582.137.camel@nc6000.w3.org>

(Thanks Paul, you beat me to it!)

Richard,

Though not official, draft minutes of last week's F2F are at:
http://www.w3.org/2005/01/19-ws-desc-minutes.html#item02

Also, if you have an opinion about what you think the Working Group
should do, please speak up!



On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 12:04, paul.downey@bt.com wrote:
> Richard
> 
> this issue has been the subject of much debate during the 
> life of the WG, and was discussed during last week's F2F:
> 
> [[
> Single interface per service issues:
>     - Issue LC73: WSDL Last Call issue [2]
>     - Issue LC75n: WSDL 2.0 Last Call Comments [3]
>     - Issue LC89k: Comments [4]
>     - Roberto's proposal [5]
>       Majority in favour of reopening?
> 
>  [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC73
>  [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC75n
>  [4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC89k
>  [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Nov/0094.html
> ]]
> 
> I suggest you observe the outcome of this discussion (the minutes
> have yet to be published) and if you have new information, consider 
> raising a separate Last Call comment (though officially the deadline 
> has expired).
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Hopkins [mailto:rph@nesc.ac.uk]
> Sent: 28 January 2005 13:32
> To: dbooth@w3.org
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; alewis@tibco.com;
> Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com; Downey,PS,Paul,XAGA C
> Subject: RE: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I picked up on this thread from the document WSDL 2.0 Primer, 21 Dec
> 2004.
> 
> I was particularly coming from looking at WSRF proposal.
> 
> One would expect a service (in a loose sense) to manage more than one
> resource-type.
> E.g a file repository managing a file resource-type and a directory
> resource-type.
> But a resource type is characterised by a resource-property document
> An interface/port-type can identify a resource-property document, but
> only one
> A service can have only one interface, and thus can manage only mange
> one-resource type.
> Unless our repository service end-point has two WSDLs, defining a
> service for files and a service for directories.
> 
> Any comments on this?
> 
> Richard  
> 
> ____________________________________________
> Richard    Hopkins
> Trainer    National e-Science Centre (Edinburgh)
>            13-15 South College Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AA 
> Email:     rph@nesc.ac.uk 
> Tel:       +44 (0)131 651 4290
> Fax:       +44 (0)131 650 9819
> Mobile:    0788 7721 964
> Home Tel:  +44 (0)131 555 3065
> ____________________________________________
> -------------------
>  
-- 

David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 21:31:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:34 GMT