- From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:58:44 +0100
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-media-types@w3.org>
It appears that LC 263 [1] indicates actually an editorial problem in
the specification as Section 2.1 does not define the contentType
attribute, but defers it to Section 3.1 instead.
We propose moving the paragraph:
{The [normalized value] of the contentType attribute information item
MUST be the name of a IANA media type token, e.g.,
"image/png","text/xml; charset=utf-16" and indicates the media type of
the [owner element].
}
>From Section 3.1 to Section 2.1. where the attribute is defined.
Also add the following statement to the same section:
{
For a discussion of media type values and their definitions, see
RFC2046[IETF RFC 2046]
}
--umit
[1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues-c
ondensed.html#x263
[2] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2046.html
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2005 00:59:18 UTC