- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:20:39 -0800
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
The WS-Addressing WG approved text along the lines of that below to reference from the [action] property to WSDL 2.0 Operation Name Mapping Best Practice. I took an action to convey to the WSDL WG the request for a corresponding informative link in WSDL to the WS-A spec along the lines below (see last paragraph). -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 2:08 PM To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org Subject: i017b: Action and ONM Per my suggestion on Monday's call, I propose cross-referencing wsa:Action and WSDL's ONM Best Practice as a workable solution to this issue. Some draft text to that effect would be: Add a second paragraph to the WS-A WSDL spec, section 3: "Ensuring that there is sufficient information within each message to distinguish which WSDL operation it is associated with is specified as a Best Practice in WSDL 2.0 [ref]. The [action] property provides a mechanism to fulfill that guideline. The defaulting mechanisms described below automatically generate unique actions for each operation. Likewise, one can explicitly associate unique values with each operation." The WSDL spec would add a corresponding statement in the ONM section along the lines of: "WS-Addressing [ref] provides a mechanism for implementing this Best Practice -- the [action] property embeds a value in each message that can be used to associate the message with a particular operation."
Received on Monday, 7 February 2005 23:06:55 UTC