W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2005

RE: apparent bug on the operation name mapping requirement text

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:08:48 -0800
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A506679B62@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Francisco Curbera" <curbera@us.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

I believe with the recent decision to rewrite the ONMR as a Best
Practice that this is no longer an issue.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Francisco Curbera
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:50 PM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
> Subject: apparent bug on the operation name mapping requirement text
> 
> 
> The core spec currently says that an extension element can be included
> in
> the interface component for indicating how the operation name mapping
> requirement is satisfied. This would not appropriately support the
> case in
> which a transport level artifact is in fact used to satisfy the
> requirement
> since it would mix binding details at the abstract level. People seem
> to
> agree this is a bug which I am now dutifully reporting.
> 
> Paco
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:09:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:34 GMT