W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > August 2005

RE: Data Access WG questions about WSDL

From: IC Dept.- MIT-Maqbool Al Maimani <maqbool@oas.com.om>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:39:49 +0400
Message-ID: <FD196CAED4D46C4288E8F13F565BF91B0264CA0B@EX_NT1.hq.omanair.com>
To: <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>

Dear All

Where can I get the latest development on WSDL, UDDI, SOAP and XAML.
Moreover, I want to know the latest on the Semantic Web Services.

Also, I would like to get the open research points and issues on web
services and semantic web services

Regards

MAQBOOL

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Kendall Clark
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 7:20 PM
To: Hugo Haas
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; Eric Prud'hommeaux
Subject: Re: Data Access WG questions about WSDL


On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:46:16PM +0200, Hugo Haas wrote:

> Oh, you're right, the multipart style is missing here, and it says:
> 
>     The localPart of the element's QName MUST be the same as the
>     Interface Operation component's name.
> 
> I am actually unsure about the motivation and need for this
> requirement of the style.

Indeed.

> > query1: GET, IRI style, application/sparql-results+xml
> > query2: GET, IRI style, application/rdf+xml
> > query3: POST, multipart style, application/sparql-results+xml
> > query4: POST, multipart style, application/rdf+xml
> > 
> > Wow, now *that's* confusing. And ugly. Really, really ugly.
> 
> Well, actually, you could have only 2 operations, and 2 bindings of
> those, one for GET and one for POST, supposing that query[1-4] are the
> same input message.

They are semantically the same input message, of course, but they aren't
the
same in the sense that matters. So, we'd have to have 4. Unless you can
have
multiple styles, which it seems you can. That helps.

Cheers, 
Kendall Clark
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2005 04:41:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:36 GMT