W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > September 2004

RE: LC45: {http location} sometimes a template, sometimes not

From: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:02:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CB1FF0A474AEA84EA0206D5B05F6A4CB0A48F4FB@pop-newton.allaire.com>
To: "'Hugo Haas'" <hugo@w3.org>, "'David Orchard'" <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


I also think that option 2 (do nothing, improve text) seems like the way to
go on this.

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Hugo Haas
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 4:34 AM
To: David Orchard
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: LC45: {http location} sometimes a template, sometimes not

* David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> [2004-09-30 01:01-0700]
> I don't quite get how 1a is crisper.  Seems like 2) is the way to go for
> me.

I had the feeling that 1a) was crisper because it was always {http
location}'s value combined with {address}'s which generated the
Request URI, without messing around with {http location}'s potential
template syntax before doing so. It was {http location template} which
was the template.

Maybe it's not that much crisper indeed, so 2) looks better.

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2004 14:03:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT