W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2004

RE: Formal objections

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:03:52 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A505623B52@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>, "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

I think the FTF would be better for this discussion.  I'll put it on the
agenda.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Glen Daniels
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 7:54 AM
> To: WS Description List
> Subject: Formal objections
> 
> 
> Hi folks:
> 
> Enclosed is a presentation I gave at the recent W3C Constraints and
> Capabilities workshop comparing WS-Policy and Features & Properties.
> I'm sending it here since it contains, among other things, an attempt
to
> frame the problems we need to deal with in resolving two of the formal
> objections we face in this group.  Check it out, in particular the
> "compromise" sections.
> 
> I'd like to spend a little time on this at an upcoming concall or at
the
> F2F in California.
> 
> Thanks,
> --Glen
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2004 18:03:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:33 GMT