W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2004

Re: is operation/@pattern optional?

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:58:53 +0600
Message-ID: <06b901c4b555$5078fb10$9dd20a0a@LANKABOOK>
To: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, "Tom Jordahl" <tomj@macromedia.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

I make it a point to remember my side of the story ;-) .. so
are we now at a "he said, she said" case??? If so 2-1, that's
a *clear* victory I'd say! No hanging chads even.

OK OK its too early to start picking on Florida yet, but better
start warming up.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
To: "Tom Jordahl" <tomj@macromedia.com>
Cc: <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: is operation/@pattern optional?


> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:09:16 -0400
> Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com> wrote:
> > You don't have to use the pattern if you have a single input or a
> > single input and output message is how I remember things.
> 
> This was the heuristic suggested by Sanjiva.  As *I* recall, it was
> voted down (although both you and Sanjiva voted in favor).
> 
> Amy!
> -- 
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Senior Architect
> TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com
Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 20:59:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:33 GMT