RE: LC45: {http location} sometimes a template, sometimes not

+1 to option 2

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Tom Jordahl
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 10:03 AM
To: 'Hugo Haas'; 'David Orchard'
Cc: 'www-ws-desc@w3.org'
Subject: RE: LC45: {http location} sometimes a template, sometimes not




I also think that option 2 (do nothing, improve text) seems like the way to
go on this.

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Hugo Haas
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 4:34 AM
To: David Orchard
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: LC45: {http location} sometimes a template, sometimes not

* David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> [2004-09-30 01:01-0700]
> I don't quite get how 1a is crisper.  Seems like 2) is the way to go for
> me.

I had the feeling that 1a) was crisper because it was always {http
location}'s value combined with {address}'s which generated the
Request URI, without messing around with {http location}'s potential
template syntax before doing so. It was {http location template} which
was the template.

Maybe it's not that much crisper indeed, so 2) looks better.

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/