W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2004

RE: LC45: {http location} sometimes a template, sometimes not

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:36:25 -0400
Message-ID: <5B10E50E14A4594EB1B5566B69AD9407068E6864@maileast>
To: 'Tom Jordahl' <tomj@macromedia.com>, 'Hugo Haas' <hugo@w3.org>, 'David Orchard' <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

+1 to option 2

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Tom Jordahl
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 10:03 AM
To: 'Hugo Haas'; 'David Orchard'
Cc: 'www-ws-desc@w3.org'
Subject: RE: LC45: {http location} sometimes a template, sometimes not




I also think that option 2 (do nothing, improve text) seems like the way to
go on this.

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Hugo Haas
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 4:34 AM
To: David Orchard
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: LC45: {http location} sometimes a template, sometimes not

* David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> [2004-09-30 01:01-0700]
> I don't quite get how 1a is crisper.  Seems like 2) is the way to go for
> me.

I had the feeling that 1a) was crisper because it was always {http
location}'s value combined with {address}'s which generated the
Request URI, without messing around with {http location}'s potential
template syntax before doing so. It was {http location template} which
was the template.

Maybe it's not that much crisper indeed, so 2) looks better.

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:36:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:33 GMT