W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2004

Media type for 1.1 (was Re: Scribe's version of the minutes of the 2004-09-30 teleconference)

From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:45:47 +0200
To: Dale Moberg <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20041001064547.GD7476@w3.org>
* Dale Moberg <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com> [2004-09-30 15:39-0700]
> Some questions about media-type:
> 
> 1. Will there be any suggestion to use the wsdl media type for wsdl 1.1?

I don't think that we should redefine a media type for WSDL 1.1.

> 2. If so, will the rules for fragment identifiers in URI-references be
> made to apply to wsdl 1.1?

Actually, this is to me the biggest argument to answer negatively to
your first question. Since the abstract models of WSDL 1.1 and WSDL
2.0 are different, the components addresed with our fragment
identifiers only make sense for WSDL 2.0 — e.g.
interfaceFault(interface/fault).

Regards,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Friday, 1 October 2004 06:48:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:33 GMT