Re: proposal: minor syntax improvement for soap fault bindings

+1 as well.

Umit Yalcinalp wrote:

> 
> +1.
> 
> Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> 
>> I suggest we move wsoap:code/wsoap:value to an attribute:
>>
>> That is, instead of:
>>
>>      <wsoap:code>
>>        <wsoap:value>xs:QName</wsoap:value>
>>        <wsoap:subcode>
>>          <wsoap:value>xs:QName</wsoap:value>
>>          <wsoap:subcode>...</wsoap:subcode>
>>        </wsoap:subcode>?
>>      </wsoap:code>
>>
>> we do:
>>
>>      <wsoap:code value="xs:QName">
>>        <wsoap:subcode value="xs:QName">
>>          <wsoap:subcode>...</wsoap:subcode>
>>        </wsoap:subcode>?
>>      </wsoap:code>
>>
>> This makes the syntax more consistent with the rest of the
>> SOAP binding which is rather attribute-heavy.
>>
>> Sanjiva.
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>