W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

Re: WSDL 1.1 to WSDL 2.0 mapping

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:51:29 -0500
To: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF735EAFB3.44BC1839-ON85256E5F.0066C0EC-85256E5F.006796AD@ca.ibm.com>
Paul,

There are things in WSDL 2.0 that cannot be expressed in WSDL 1.1, e.g. 
interface inheritance. However, it is probably feasible to imbed WSDL 1.1 
into WSDL 2.0, although you may have to invent some extensions (e.g. for 
SOAP encoding).

Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063
intranet: http://w3.torolab.ibm.com/DEAB/



<paul.downey@bt.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
03/22/2004 11:23 AM

To
<www-ws-desc@w3.org>
cc

Subject
WSDL 1.1 to WSDL 2.0 mapping







one of the more difficult questions i'm being asked at the moment
is how we will migrate from our WSDL 1.1 documents into WSDL 2.0
when it arrives.

This task would be vastly simplified if there was a standard mapping 
between the two languages, with an indication of which WSDL 1.1 features
cannot be expressed in WSDL 1.1 and vice-versa.

Given we now have a nice component model for WSDL 2.0, is it feasible
to provided WSDL 1.1 serialisation and deserialisation for WSDL 2.0 ?
If so, could this be written up as a W3C note under this WG ?

Paul

-- 
Paul Sumner Downey
Web Services Integration
BT Exact
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 13:52:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT