W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

Re: wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:51:29 -0500
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFBC3C2B71.7111CBDF-ON85256E5F.0066095C-85256E5F.006796AA@ca.ibm.com>
Sanjiva,

Looks good. However, I think the main movitation is for QName resolution 
(as opposed to embedding WSDL fragments in other XML documents), i.e. an 
XML document may contain no WSDL fragment but instead simply desire to 
refer to a component via a QName.

Also, it might be wothwhile to state that in the list of URI pairs, the 
namespace MUST be an absolute URI, but the location MAY be relative. If 
relative then the usual rules apply, i.e. the document must establish a 
base URI, e.g. the document URI or use XML Base.

Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063
intranet: http://w3.torolab.ibm.com/DEAB/



"Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
03/22/2004 11:49 AM

To
<www-ws-desc@w3.org>
cc

Subject
wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute







Hi,

I've written up the WSDL location attribute stuff; see:

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html#wsdlloca

tion

I looked at the description in XSD [1], but that didn't quite
seem like the kinda Swahili we want to use. So I came up with
a variation. Please help edit/clarify/re-write.

Sanjiva.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#schema-loc
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 13:52:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT