W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Processor conformance: fault on non-conformant input

From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:36:15 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040318145802.03bd3438@localhost>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Sanjiva,

Oops, I just realized that this should have been phrased in a way that 
permits the processor to ignore portions of the WSDL document that it 
doesn't need, as already stated in section 7.3.

Consequently, please change the sentence above the 7.3 bullet list to:
[[
A conformant WSDL processor MUST adhere to the following rules:
]]

and then change the newly added bullet item to:
[[
A conformant WSDL processor MUST fault if a portion of a WSDL document is 
illegal according to this specification and the WSDL processor attempts to 
process that portion.
]]
Stylistically, I would suggest that this be moved up to become the second 
bullet item.


At 12:06 AM 3/19/2004 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

>Done!
>
>Sanjiva.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
>To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
>Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 11:18 PM
>Subject: Processor conformance: fault on non-conformant input
>
>
> >
> > Here is an additional processor conformance requirement to add, as
> > discussed on today's call:
> >
> > [[
> > A conformant processor MUST fault if presented with a non-conformant WSDL
> > 2.0 document.
> > ]]
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Booth
> > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> > Telephone: +1.617.253.1273

-- 
David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 15:36:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT