W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

Re: component designators spec - where art thou?

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:05:47 +0600
Message-ID: <16e401c40d1c$0791d660$02c8a8c0@watson.ibm.com>
To: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>

Hi Arthur,

I've incorporated the old component designators text from an old
working draft (pointed to by Jonathan) into the draft. Please
update the text there (would appreciate if you could edit the
XML directly and post a patch or the whole thing).

Thanks!

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>; <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: component designators spec - where art thou?


> Sanjiva,
>
> Will do.
>
> Arthur Ryman,
> Rational Desktop Tools Development
>
> phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
> assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
> fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
> mobile: +1-416-939-5063
> intranet: http://w3.torolab.ibm.com/DEAB/
>
>
>
> "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
> 03/16/2004 04:37 AM
>
> To
> Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> cc
> <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>
> Subject
> Re: component designators spec - where art thou?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Arthur,
>
> Can you please update the component designators spec to be
> consistent with the new syntax (no <message> etc.)?
>
> If you can start with the version that Jonathan pointed to and
> update that then I can easily merge that in to the draft.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
> To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
> Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>; <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:11 AM
> Subject: Re: component designators spec - where art thou?
>
>
> > Sanjiva,
> >
> > I'm not sure what the SHOULD refers to, but the fragment syntax I
> proposed
> > now is consistent with Web Architecture since we recommended that
> > namespace URI's point to WSDL documents. The way this works is as
> follows:
> >
> > 1. register the new content type with IANA. in our case it is
> > application/wsdl+xml
> > 2. register/describe the new fragment syntax with the new content type
> > registration
> >
> > Now the algorithm is as follows for intertrepping a URI such as
> > namespace-uri#fragment
> >
> > 1. dereference namespace-uri and get a resource whose content type is
> > application/wsdl+xml
> > 2. intepret the fragment as defined by application/wsdl+xml - this
> > idenitfies a component
> >
> > The fragment syntax I proposed was compliant with the XPointer
> Framework.
> > The syntax has to be updated to reflect the current state of the spec,
> but
> > the general form is component-type(name-path) where component-type is
> > interface, binding, operation, etc, and name-path is the hierarchical
> path
> > formed by the NCNames of the component and its parents, e.g.
> > operation(myInterface/myOperation).
> >
> > Arthur Ryman,
> > Rational Desktop Tools Development
> >
> > phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
> > assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
> > fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
> > mobile: +1-416-939-5063
> > intranet: http://w3.torolab.ibm.com/DEAB/
> >
> >
> >
> > "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
> > Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
> > 03/15/2004 10:31 AM
> >
> > To
> > <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > component designators spec - where art thou?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I'd like to fulfill the following:
> >
> > EDTODO    2004-03-04: Editors to add back the WSDL Component Designators
> >                       back to the spec as SHOULD.
> >
> > Arthur?
> >
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 14:06:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT