Re: Processor conformance: fault on non-conformant input from Sanjiva Weerawarana on 2004-03-18 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from March 2004)

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:06:46 +0600
To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <169f01c40d13$d0ba5a70$02c8a8c0@watson.ibm.com>

Done!

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 11:18 PM
Subject: Processor conformance: fault on non-conformant input


>
> Here is an additional processor conformance requirement to add, as
> discussed on today's call:
>
> [[
> A conformant processor MUST fault if presented with a non-conformant WSDL
> 2.0 document.
> ]]
>
>
> --
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> Telephone: +1.617.253.1273

Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 13:07:58 UTC